<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UFOlogy.iNFO &#187; Incidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ufology24.ru/category/incidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ufology24.ru</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ru-RU</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Experts claim that incidents of UFO can be explained</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/experts-claim-that-incidents-of-ufo-can-be-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/experts-claim-that-incidents-of-ufo-can-be-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been many recent reports of UFO sightings in many different regions and the latest incident involved netizens from Shanghai, Zhejiang, Nanjing and Ganzhou of Jiangxi Province, who claimed they saw UFOs all at different times on Aug. 7. Along with the continual media coverage, public attention also heated up, and some people even [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://ufology24.ru/?attachment_id=523" rel="attachment wp-att-523"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-523" style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" alt="UFO-UFOs-sighting-sightings-alien-aliens-Angelina-Jolie-orb-orbs-NASA" src="http://ufology24.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/UFO-UFOs-sighting-sightings-alien-aliens-Angelina-Jolie-orb-orbs-NASA-300x253.png" width="300" height="253" /></a>There have been many recent reports of UFO sightings in many different regions and the latest incident involved netizens from Shanghai, Zhejiang, Nanjing and Ganzhou of Jiangxi Province, who claimed they saw UFOs all at different times on Aug. 7.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Along with the continual media coverage, public attention also heated up, and some people even connected it with the recent abnormal weather and natural pits in many regions, and claimed the world would end in 2012. All of a sudden, different rumors are everywhere.<span id="more-522"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A reporter from People&#8217;s Daily interviewed Zhu Jin, the curator of the Beijing Planetarium and vice chairman of the Beijing UFO Research Organization. He gave professional explanations about these incidents.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">UFOs and flying saucers are different. Unidentified Flying Objects refer to objects flying in the sky with unidentified names and is abbreviated UFO. The flying saucer refers to a saucer shaped flying object and in particular, a strange spaceship that many people claimed to have seen and may come from outer space.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">UFOs differ from flying saucers. A flying saucer is one possible UFOs, and there are no cases where one has been confirmed. However, UFOs do exist, and they just have not been identified yet.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As for the latest reported UFOs, they are very easy to identify. Most of them are kites, planes or rockets. There is almost no probability that these incidents are connected with aliens.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There are many reasons for the appearance of UFOs. The research of past relevant phenomena reveals that there are mainly three categories. First, they are flying objects including planes, airships, kites, searchlights, little insects very close to the photographer, bolides, man-made objects falling into the atmosphere, spacecraft, and missiles.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Second, they are stationary objects in the sky but are photographed as moving objects, including planets, shiny fixed stars, the moon behind clouds and even the sun. The last possibility is that they are not in the sky at all and they may be the reflection of the sun being photographed on the frame of the camera, the reflection of the flashlight on glass, and the ghost images caused by the light source at the centrosymmetric location of the visual field.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The appearance of UFOs is not concentrated in a certain region or a certain period of time. Currently, relevant events are obviously increasing, mainly because that the concentrative reporting of the media caused similar psychological effects. People who were not concerned about UFOs before began to frequently look up into the sky after reading the reports.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Incidents that would normally be considered as normal were connected with UFOs indicative of relevant reports. The concentrative reporting from the media amplified the events and certain media groups were even suspected of hyping up the news.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The public should treat these kinds of events with a scientific attitude, independent judgment and rational analysis. It is better to objectively record various phenomena through taking photos and videos. Some events will be easy to explain if there is sufficient image data.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">China currently has no official professional investigation agency for UFOs. Therefore, it is necessary to ask professional research agencies to investigate UFO events to eliminate people&#8217;s doubts and fears. Some registered professional associations have been concerned with UFO phenomena for a long time and they possess certain observational knowledge and analysis and are more professional.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In fact, most UFO events can be explained by rational reason through systematic investigation and comprehensive analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/experts-claim-that-incidents-of-ufo-can-be-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kenneth Arnold’s Mount Rainier, Washington Sighting, 1947</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/kenneth-arnolds-mount-rainier-washington-sighting-1947/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/kenneth-arnolds-mount-rainier-washington-sighting-1947/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what is considered the true start of the modern UFO era, Seattle pilot and businessman Kevin Arnold spotted a number of “undulating” shapes flying over Mount Rainier one afternoon in May, 1947, moving at speeds many times faster that the best aircraft of the day could achieve. Somehow he got the media’s attention after [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/KennethArnoldPX1947-432x400.jpg" width="300" />In what is considered the true start of the modern UFO era, Seattle pilot and businessman Kevin Arnold spotted a number of “undulating” shapes flying over Mount Rainier one afternoon in May, 1947, moving at speeds many times faster that the best aircraft of the day could achieve. Somehow he got the media’s attention after he landed and, upon declaring that the objects seemed to “skip like saucers across a pond”, the term “flying saucer” was born, thus starting a new chapter in the world of aerial phenomena. <span id="more-279"></span>Skeptics today continue to challenge Arnold’s assessment of the craft’s actual speed and distance or claim they were merely light reflections off his own cockpit window, but it can’t be denied that whatever it was Mr. Arnold saw that day, his curious encounter in the skies over the Pacific Northwest had a greater effect on our culture than even he could have imagined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/kenneth-arnolds-mount-rainier-washington-sighting-1947/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roswell, New Mexico Crash and Recovery, 1947</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/roswell-new-mexico-crash-and-recovery-1947/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/roswell-new-mexico-crash-and-recovery-1947/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No single incident did more to put allegedly crashed saucers and little green men into the public consciousness than what took place in July of 1947 some fifty miles north of the New Mexico city of Roswell when an unassuming farmer named Matt Brazell discovered a debris field strewn with tiny metallic strips and wooden [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/roswell-debris-1947-331x400.jpg" width="300" />No single incident did more to put allegedly crashed saucers and little green men into the public consciousness than what took place in July of 1947 some fifty miles north of the New Mexico city of Roswell when an unassuming farmer named Matt Brazell discovered a debris field strewn with tiny metallic strips and wooden sticks near his farm. Having heard about “flying disks” in the papers (the Arnold sighting having made national headlines two months earlier), Matt wondered if he hadn’t stumbled across his very own crashed flying saucer and immediately contacted local military authorities. <span id="more-280"></span>Curiously, at first they agreed with the farmer’s assessment and declared that a “crashed disk” had been recovered, only to recant hours later and claim the debris was part of a crashed weather balloon all along. That seemed to put an end the story and it was quickly relegated to the dustbin of UFO folklore until the late seventies when the Army Air Force intelligence officer who had been sent to pick the stuff up (which he stuffed into the trunk of his car)—one Jesse Marcel—claimed the material he recovered was extraterrestrial after all, creating a conspiracy theory of epic proportions that refuses to die to this day.</p>
<p>So ingrained in the popular culture did the Roswell “crash” eventually become, that even when the Air Force came clean in 1995 by declassifying its up-to-then top secret Mogul project and admitting they had made the whole crash disk part up in an attempt to divert attention from Mogul’s true mission (high altitude balloons carrying long arrays of instruments designed to detect evidence of Soviet atomic blasts in the upper atmosphere), most ufologists refused to accept it. Since then, the story has diverged from its original account of a single debris field into stories of multiple crashes, loads of dead aliens, and charges that the technology recovered from it and a half dozen other crashes since (apparently UFOs crash with some regularity) is behind most of the great technological advances of the last fifty years. It also turned the formerly sleepy little enclave of Roswell into a Mecca for UFO buffs and created a cottage industry that will probably stand longer than the Roman Empire did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/roswell-new-mexico-crash-and-recovery-1947/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tie) Belgium Incident, 1990</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/tie-belgium-incident-1990/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/tie-belgium-incident-1990/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an incident remarkably similar to the Tehran case in 1976, NATO jets were again scrambled on the evening of March 30, 1990 to pursue a series of dark, triangular-shaped UFOs over the Belgian countryside. What was especially impressive about this sighting were the speeds and capabilities of the craft, which appeared capable of making [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/TriangleBelgium1990-545x400.jpg" width="300" />In an incident remarkably similar to the Tehran case in 1976, NATO jets were again scrambled on the evening of March 30, 1990 to pursue a series of dark, triangular-shaped UFOs over the Belgian countryside. <span id="more-278"></span>What was especially impressive about this sighting were the speeds and capabilities of the craft, which appeared capable of making maneuvers that would have killed a human pilot. Also like the Tehran incident, not only were the craft seen by numerous ground witnesses, but they were also picked up by ground controllers and the aircraft’s onboard weapons radars and even photographed, making it hands down the best documented UFO sighting on record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/tie-belgium-incident-1990/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tie) Tehran, Iran Incident, 1976</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/tie-tehran-iran-incident-1976/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/tie-tehran-iran-incident-1976/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up until 1976, the complaint had always been that UFOs seemed remarkably resistant to being spotted on radar (though not always) implying that they were more imaginary than extraterrestrial. That all changed when in the predawn hours of September 19, 1976, Iranian jet fighters (this was before the Islamic Revolution when the U.S. and Iran [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Iranian-F-4-fighter-560x247.jpg" width="300" />Up until 1976, the complaint had always been that UFOs seemed remarkably resistant to being spotted on radar (though not always) implying that they were more imaginary than extraterrestrial. That all changed when in the predawn hours of September 19, 1976, Iranian jet fighters (this was before the Islamic Revolution when the U.S. and Iran were close allies) were sent to chase after a wildly maneuvering UFO in the skies over Tehran after several radar stations picked the thing up. <span id="more-277"></span>Even more impressive, the craft effected the jet’s systems directly whenever they drew too close, rendering their electronics equipment inoperable and, in one case, even causing one jet’s weapons system to fail completely as it closed to fire. The incident is regarded as one of the premier UFO encounters ever recorded, not only due to the quality and preponderance of evidence (the craft may have even been picked up by the military satellite DSP-1) but because of the direct impact it had on the instrumentation and radars of several different aircraft involved in the pursuit. Skeptic’s charges that the pilots were simply in hot pursuit of an especially bright planet Jupiter was met more with laughter than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/tie-tehran-iran-incident-1976/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barney and Betty Hill Abduction, 1961</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/barney-and-betty-hill-abduction-1961/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/barney-and-betty-hill-abduction-1961/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first of the abduction incidents (but definitely not the last) on the evening of September 19, 1961, Betty and Barney Hill spotted what they believed was a UFO while they drove down a lonely stretch of road near Groveton, New Hampshire. Though they couldn’t consciously recall what happened after that (and were missing [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/BarneyBetty-Hill.jpg" width="300" />In the first of the abduction incidents (but definitely not the last) on the evening of September 19, 1961, Betty and Barney Hill spotted what they believed was a UFO while they drove down a lonely stretch of road near Groveton, New Hampshire. <span id="more-275"></span>Though they couldn’t consciously recall what happened after that (and were missing several hours, for which they couldn’t account) for weeks afterwards they each complained of having frightening dreams about being prodded and poked by “grey aliens” as part of some sort of bizarre medical examination before being released. The nightmares became so acute they eventually sought help and were eventually hypnotized and interviewed by a Doctor Benjamin Simon of Boston, who concluded the couple may have been significantly influenced by a television episode featuring humanoid aliens they saw a few weeks before their “encounter” and were innocently fantasizing the event, though he also admitted that did not satisfactorily explain every aspect of their case. Whether the victims of an overactive imagination (the couple were noted for their eccentricities) or genuine abductees, the case remains a source of considerable debate to this day, and probably laid the groundwork for the more spectacular Travis Walton and Pascagoula, Mississippi abduction cases in the 1970’s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/barney-and-betty-hill-abduction-1961/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAL Flight 1628, 1986</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/jal-flight-1628-1986/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/jal-flight-1628-1986/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 16, 1986 a UFO described as being “three times larger than an aircraft carrier” flew alongside Japan Air Lines Flight 1628 for 50 minutes as it flew over northeastern Alaska, with the objects even being intermittently picked up by both civilian and military ground radar. What makes this incident so impressive was the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/JAL-Pilot.jpg" width="300" />On November 16, 1986 a UFO described as being “three times larger than an aircraft carrier” flew alongside Japan Air Lines Flight 1628 for 50 minutes as it flew over northeastern Alaska, with the objects even being intermittently picked up by both civilian and military ground radar. <span id="more-276"></span>What makes this incident so impressive was the amount of time the object was seen, the credibility and sheer number of witnesses (the crew and all the passengers) and the fact that it was also picked up on radar, instantly rendering it one of the most impressive UFO sightings on record and one that remains inexplicable to this day. What’s even more remarkable is that it is one of the few cases in which the crew of a civilian airliner was willing to discuss the incident in public, making it even more extraordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/jal-flight-1628-1986/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kecksburg, Pennsylvania UFO Crash, 1965</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/kecksburg-pennsylvania-ufo-crash-1965/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/kecksburg-pennsylvania-ufo-crash-1965/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 9, 1965, a large, brilliant fireball was seen by thousands in at least six states and Ontario, Canada as it streaked through the night sky, eventually coming down somewhere near the small Pennsylvania town of Kecksburg. Assumed at the time to be an especially large fireball (a meteor of unusual brightness), residents were [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Kecksburg-516x400.jpg" width="516" height="400" />On December 9, 1965, a large, brilliant fireball was seen by thousands in at least six states and Ontario, Canada as it streaked through the night sky, eventually coming down somewhere near the small Pennsylvania town of Kecksburg. <span id="more-273"></span>Assumed at the time to be an especially large fireball (a meteor of unusual brightness), residents were concerned when the army quickly converged on the area and were seen to haul away some kind of bell shaped craft from the woods, again fueling speculation that the government was up to its old tricks again. Some later speculated it was a crashed Soviet satellite, though this remains hotly disputed by ufologists to this day. However, it should be noted that recovering a Soviet satellite during the height of the Cold War would explain the reason for the heavy-handed army presence and the secrecy; of course, so would a crashed Venusian saucer, so the debate continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/kecksburg-pennsylvania-ufo-crash-1965/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mantell Incident, 1948</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/mantell-incident-1948/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/mantell-incident-1948/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what might be the first fatality directly attributed to an unidentified flying object, Air National Guard pilot Captain Thomas F. Mantell crashed his P-51 fighter while in pursuit of an unusual object in the skies over Kentucky on January 7, 1948. Flying without oxygen at high altitude in pursuit of a “silver disk shaped” [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/crashmantell1948.jpg" width="300" />In what might be the first fatality directly attributed to an unidentified flying object, Air National Guard pilot Captain Thomas F. Mantell crashed his P-51 fighter while in pursuit of an unusual object in the skies over Kentucky on January 7, 1948. Flying without oxygen at high altitude in pursuit of a “silver disk shaped” craft, he apparently blacked out when he tried to get closer to whatever the thing was, with tragic consequences. <span id="more-274"></span>Later investigation suggests that what Captain Mantell may have been chasing was actually a large Skyhook weather balloon, which can take on a disk-like appearance when seen from below and has a highly reflective silvery surface to boot. If that’s the case, then Mantell was a victim of his own zeal and disregard for Air Force procedures in flying above his safe maximum altitude, demonstrating that presumption may be more dangerous than extraterrestrials. The incident did manage to change the public perceptions of UFOs, however, leading some people to see the alien visitors as potentially dangerous rather than the fun-loving little green men they had been assumed to be up to then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/mantell-incident-1948/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington, DC Sightings, 1952</title>
		<link>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/washington-dc-sightings-1952/</link>
		<comments>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/washington-dc-sightings-1952/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufology24.ru/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1952 Washington, D.C. was all abuzz when ground controllers at Washington National Airport (now Reagan International Airport) spotted multiple targets on their radars as well as observed glowing orbs of light on the horizon, prompting the Air Force to launch fighters in a futile attempt to close with the objects. The incident, which took [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" alt="" src="http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/WashDC-UFOs.jpg" width="300" />In 1952 Washington, D.C. was all abuzz when ground controllers at Washington National Airport (now Reagan International Airport) spotted multiple targets on their radars as well as observed glowing orbs of light on the horizon, prompting the Air Force to launch fighters in a futile attempt to close with the objects. The incident, which took place on two consecutive weekends between July 13 and July 29, 1952, even got the President’s attention and had almost immediate repercussions. Deciding that the best defense was a strong offense, the government implemented something called the Robertson Panel. <span id="more-271"></span>The Robertson Panel was a committee of prominent scientists appointed to spend two days examining the “best” UFO cases collected by Project Blue Book (an eighteen-year-long Air Force study that was to look into more than 12,000 UFO reports before it was discontinued in 1969). They promptly concluded that the Air Force and Project Blue Book needed to spend less time analyzing and studying UFO reports and more time publicly debunking them. Unfortunately, this decision to debunk rather than investigate has haunted the government ever since and remains the chief reason “official” government explanations generally fall upon deaf ears to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ufology24.ru/incidents/washington-dc-sightings-1952/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
