• British FOIA Rendlesham File Released

    Published 16 Дек 2012 admin No Reviews

    Summary: The so-called Rendlesham File, now available for public inspection, is a fat catalogue of increasingly despairing correspondence between the Ministry of Defence and members of the public after the sighting of unexplained lights in Rendlesham Forest, near the RAF base at Woodbridge, Suffolk, in December 1980.
    HOW UFO FEVER TAXED MEN FROM THE MINISTRY

    A report of alien sightings prompted floods of letters to the
    MoD, reports Alan Hamilton. New laws have made these public,
    explains Frances Gibb.

    While British and American defence chiefs were supposed to be
    keeping a watchful eye on the Soviet threat in Europe during the
    1980s, they were spending an undue amount of energy dealing with
    little green men.

    The so-called Rendlesham File, now available for public
    inspection, is a fat catalogue of increasingly despairing
    correspondence between the Ministry of Defence and members of
    the public after the sighting of unexplained lights in
    Rendlesham Forest, near the RAF base at Woodbridge, Suffolk, in
    December 1980.

    The story was given wing by its detailed disclosure in the News
    of the World in 1983.

    Soon after the alleged incident, reported by the USAF deputy
    base commander at nearby Bentwaters, the MoD drew up an internal
    memo: «No evidence was found of any threat to the defence of the
    United Kingdom, and no further investigations were carried out.

    «No further information has come to light which alters our view
    that the sightings of these lights was of no defence
    significance.»

    Nothing was picked up on radar that night, officials added, and
    they concluded that the airmen had confused the lights with the
    beam of Orford Ness lighthouse, distorted by trees, or a natural
    fireball.

    But the Ministry and the RAF were bombarded with inquiries from
    the public.Officials suggested that besieged officers at
    Bentwaters should take the line that «there was no question of
    any contact with alien beings.»

    They should also dismiss rumours that the UFO story was a cover-
    up for the crash of an aircraft carrying nuclear material.

    Still the letters poured in. Two years later an increasingly
    short- tempered MoD was writing to one correspondent demanding a
    full investigation: «There is no organisation in MoD appointed
    soleyl for the purpose of studying reports of such objects, and
    no staff are employed on the subject full-time.»

    It added: «We have to recognise that there are many strange
    things to be seen in the sky, but we believe there are adequate
    explanations for them.»

    Things got worse as forged letters purporting to come from MoD
    officials began to circulate. One, apparently on Ministry
    notepaper, claimed that a craft of unknown origin and «crewed by
    several entities» had landed near Bentwaters.

    The entities, it went on, were about one and a half metres tall
    and wore nylon-coated pressure suits but no helmets. They had
    claw-like hands with three digits and an opposable thumb. One
    self-styled researcher into «cosmic conspiracy», having seen the
    letter, wrote to the MoD requesting further information on the
    craft which had landed for several hours to carry out repairs,
    during which time the USAF base commander had conversed with its
    crew.

    An MoD official replied tersely: «I am afraid that it is a
    forgery… I have no idea where it came from or why it was
    written and can only conclude that it was intended by someone as
    a joke.»

    MPs forwarded letters from worried constituents convinced of a
    cover-up. One passed on by David Alton, MP, said in part: «There
    is clear evidence that British airspace and territory were
    intruded upon by an unidentified vehicle on two occasions in
    late December 1980, and that no authority was able to prevent
    this.»

    Some correspondents continued to harry MoD until officials were
    driven to reply: «I suggest that there is little point in
    continuing this correspondence.»

    The final letter in the fiel is dated July 1992, in which an MoD
    official writes to the RAF liaison officer at Bentwaters asking
    if the original USAF report of the sightings was genuine, «as a
    number of hoaxes have been circulating for years.»

    Squadron Leader P. Rooney at Bentwaters had the last word: «I
    have no records on this subject and the file to which you refer
    has long been destroyed.»

    WHAT AIRMEN FOUND IN THE WOODS

    A GRAPHIC description of the «unusual lights» that were
    suspected of being a UFO is described in the Rendlesham file.

    The lights were spotted by two USAF security police patrolmen,
    according to a report dated January 1981 headed «unexplained
    lights,» written by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt, deputy base
    commander at RAF Bentwaters in Suffolk.

    He states: «Thinking an aircraft might have crashed or been
    forced down, they called for permission to go outside the gates
    and investigate.

    «The individuals reported seeing a strange glowing object in the
    forest. The object was described as being metallic in appearance
    and triangular in shape, approximately two to three metres
    across the base and approximately two metres high. It
    illuminated the entire forest with a white light.

    «The object itself had a pulsing red light on top and a bank of
    blue lights underneath. The object was hovering or on legs. The
    object was hovering or on legs. As the patrolmen approached the
    object, it manoeuvred through the trees and disappeared. At this
    time, the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy. The
    object was briefly sighted approximately an hour later near the
    back gate.»

    The report goes on to describe the depressions found in the
    ground and in a tree the next day. «Later in the night, a red
    sun-light light was seen through the trees. It moved about and
    pulsed. At one point it appeared to throw off glowing particles
    and then broke into five separate white objects and then
    disappeared.

    «Immediately thereafter, three star-like objects were noticed in
    the sky, two objects to the north and one to the south, all of
    which were about ten degrees off the horizon.»

    The MoD made further inquiries. No unidentified flying object
    had been seen on radar at the times in question nor was there
    any evidence of anything having intruded into British airspace.

    One theory, it concluded, was that what was seen was the beam of
    Orford Ness lighthouse, with distortions caused by its being
    seen through trees. But «in the absence of any hard evidence»
    the MoD remains open-minded about these sightings.

    PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO KNOW EXTENDED

    DETAILS about UFO sightings, clinical trials, accident
    investigations and Whitehall meetings will be released to the
    public under plans to open up government.

    Public access to information from government bodies is to be
    extended by the scrapping and amending of up to 100 pieces of
    legislation, the Lord Chancellor’s Department announced
    yesterday.

    The changes are being made under the Freedom of Information Act
    which is being phased in over the next three years.

    >From Sunday the first tranche of hitherto secret information is
    released when government departments publish their own schemes
    of legislation which they plan to release to the public. The
    material will be made available immediately on departmental
    websites or through application by post.

    The Ministry of Defence achives will include information on
    UFOs, including the Rendlesham File about a UFO report in
    Suffolk in 1980. The Lord Chancellor’s Department is to publish
    the guidance given to lawyers applying to be Queen’s Counsel or
    judges.

    comments are closed.